ENGLISH: The House Of Representatives (DPR) Suggested Ad Hoc’s Court

| HOME | | ENGLISH | | NEWS IMAGE | | REVIEW | | DIALOQUE | | EDITORS | | RESEARCH - POLLING |

The House Of Representatives (DPR) Suggested Ad Hoc’s Court

Posting Time 2/22/2008 06:55:00 PM

(Jakarta) - The formation process of Human Rights Ad Hoc’s Court that asked by National Commission (komnas) of Human Rights (HAM) actually suggested by The House of Representatives (DPR), because at this time The House can not estimate by their self there’s a big human rights’ violation.

That’s what Law and Human Rights Minister Andi M Mattalata comments the decision of Constitutional Court (MK) on February 2008 related The House that can’t be expected more there’s big violation of human rights, that’s National Commission (komnas) of Human Rights (HAM) as the investigator and the High Court as the investigator.

“That’s final decision so what can we do, if The House decide there’s violation in Ad Hoc, wait for the results of investigation and the observant, that’s the same gateways, don’t always throws the ball,” Andi said in Depkumham’s building, Kuningan, Jakarta, Friday (22/2).

Throws the ball, Andi said, it’s happened all the time in The House, “The House said the investigator’s team that should decide, meanwhile the investigator’s team said The House which decide. Now by Consititutional Court Ad Hoc’s decision so The House can lying or suggested makes Human Rights Ad Hoc’s court, he explained.

The Constitutional Court’s decision happened to consider Eurico Gutteres’s postulate about formation process Human Rights Ad Hoc’s Court that involved The House. According to postulate, the formation Human Rights Ad Hoc’s Court that involved the House with based on “estimation has already happened big human rights’ violation” very political and opens the changes intervention by the law’s process. The House’s part can mean take the place judicial power and destroys Principe integrated justice system. (Dhita/trans.Ocha)

No comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

It’s been couple of month since I’ve been practicing what has already said by the famous book “the secret”. Turn out the impact is extra ordinary. The small book that has already exists in the format of DVD actually simple enough and easy to understand. The secret only told that every person has ability to absorb the positive energy that the nature had. All begins and depends on what’s inside of our mind; the meaning is, if the positive things that we think of will reap positive things also. In the contrary as well, if the negative things that’s inside our mind so don’t be surprised if someday there will be negative impacts that will be in our harvest.
The great things are every positive thought has a power several times stronger more than the negative energy.
It seems easy to speak out but hard to do. Moreover when is related to insides people head, sometimes the different is between what’s inside peoples mind and what’s peoples in the end done. But after several times trying to practice turn out as not difficult as it seems. So simple, every wakes up in the morning just beginning with positive thinking that today is a bright day and we should grateful for it. Even though out there are raining and floats, which influence on the street traffic jam, but the positive energy that we collect since early morning can moves the universe to “follow” the willingness of our heart. The result is we can enjoy the traffic jam and the water flooding with positive. Better than spend energy to curse out the bureaucrat that used to be promised to resolve the traffic jam and the capital float matter.
I remember, if since early morning our feelings has already blue, so all day long everything that we do will be not optimal.
If every person could do little thing but positive, I am sure it will refine goodness for lots of people. The government and opposes, it is good if there were no suspicions at the first. So that every government policy that made for the sake of the people of course can give maximal result for the people. Critic’s indeed is important but in the meaning of constructive, not to crumble down or to besmirch each other. For ourselves, there is no mistakes if we starting to think and act positive, beginning with our neighborhood and our working place. Even though is small things but positive. (Ddk/Trans.Devi)